United States Second Circuit

In an ERISA action claiming that defendant's benefit plan violated ERISA's minimum benefit accrual rules, partial summary judgment for plaintiffs is reversed where the plan complied with ERISA's minimum benefit accrual rules, and defendant did not violate ERISA's section 204(h) notice requirements.

Appellate Information

• Decided 10/19/2009
• Published 10/19/2009

Judges

• WESLEY, Circuit Judge:, Before:  JACOBS, Chief Judge, WESLEY, Circuit Judge, and CROTTY, District Judge.

Court

• United States Second Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Edgar Pauk, Law Office of Edgar Pauk, Esq., Brooklyn, NY, and Brad Nelson Friedman, Milberg LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants., Derek W. Loeser, Keller Rohrback LLP, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Myron D. Rumeld, Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, NY;  Lewis R. Clayton, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison, LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees.