Skip to main content

United States Second Circuit


Rotimi v. Holder, 06-0202

Petition for review of an order holding plaintiff statutorily ineligible for a waiver of inadmissibility and dismissing plaintiff's appeal is denied where the Board of Immigration Appeals' interpretation of "lawfully resided continuously" as it is used in Immigration and Nationality Act sec. 212(h) and applied to plaintiff is reasonable, and thus plaintiff is ineligible for a INA sec. 212(h) waiver because he did not lawfully reside continuously in the United States for the disputed period of time.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/14/2009
  • Published 08/14/2009

Judges

  • Before:  FEINBERG, NEWMAN, and KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Second Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Daniel Shabasson, Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, Esqs., New York, N.Y., for Petitioner.

  • For Appellees:
  • Dione M. Enea, Special Assistant United States Attorney, for Benton J. Campbell, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Brooklyn, N.Y., for Respondents.
Copied to clipboard