United States Second Circuit

In an action involving maritime attachment and garnishment claims, district court's vacatur of the maritime attachment obtained by plaintiff is affirmed and motion for a stay dismissed as moot where defendants met the requirements for being found in the district for purposes of Rule B of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, and thus plaintiffs are not entitled to maintain the attachment.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/19/2009
• Published 03/19/2009

Judges

• PER CURIAM:, Before:  WALKER, CALABRESI, and WESLEY, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Second Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Christopher Carlsen, Clyde and Co. U.S. LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• James H. Power, (Lisa D. Schaupp on the brief), Holland & Knight, LLP, New York, NY, for Defendants-Appellees.