Skip to main content

United States Second Circuit


US v. Worjloh, 063129

Conviction for conspiring to distribute cocaine base and possessing with intent to distribute is affirmed and sentence is vacated and remanded where: 1) federal prosecutors did not seek to offer any evidence obtained by state officials in violation of the Sixth Amendment; 2) district court did not abuse discretion in denying a suppression hearing to enable the court to conclude that contested issues of fact existed as to whether defendant's initiation of conversation with the federal agents was "anything but voluntary"; 3) defendant did not demonstrate that the affiant knowingly misled the Judge; 4) it was highly unlikely that the challenged jury instruction improperly influenced the jury; and 5) district court has to determine whether it would impose a different sentence given its discretion to depart from the Guidelines for crack cocaine.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 10/08/2008
  • Published 10/08/2008

Judges

Court

  • United States Second Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard