United States Second Circuit

Conviction and sentence for conspiring to engage in racketeering in violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) are affirmed over claims of error that: 1) the evidence was not legally sufficient to establish defendant's conviction for RICO conspiracy; 2) the district court erred in admitting the contents of two intercepted phone calls and allowing a witness to interpret those phone calls; 3) one of the racketeering acts alleged in the indictment was improperly vague; and 4) the district court erred in rendering his sentence.

Appellate Information

• Decided 09/04/2008
• Published 09/04/2008

Judges

Court

• United States Second Circuit

Counsel