United States Second Circuit
Burke v. Hamilton Equip. Installers, Inc., 06-5249, 06-5425
Judgment finding one corporation not liable for the ERISA debt liability of another corporation is affirmed where the underlying relationship between the companies did not establish a sufficient nexus for derivative liability on the grounds of either an alter-ego or a veil-piercing theory.
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/04/2008
- Published 06/04/2008
Judges
- PER CURIAM:, Before: WINTER, SACK, Circuit Judges, and MURTHA, District Judge.
Court
- United States Second Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Jonathan G. Johnsen, Creighton, Pearce, Johnsen & Giroux, Buffalo, NY, for Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross-Appellees., Philip B. Abramowitz, Barth, Sullivan and Baer LLP, Buffalo, New York (Jason H. Sterne, Williamsville, NY, on the brief), for Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant and Defendants-Appellees.