United States Second Circuit
US v. Tsekhanovich, 05-4809
Conviction and sentence for false statements, mail fraud, and health care fraud-related charges is affirmed where the district court did not exceed its allowable discretion by admitting challenged testimony, as the government demonstrated that the lay opinion testimony was sufficiently based on and rationally derived from the witness's first-hand perceptions.
Appellate Information
- Decided 10/24/2007
- Published 10/24/2007
Judges
- PER CURIAM:, Before: MINER, CABRANES, and STRAUB, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Second Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Paul S. Brenner, New York, NY, for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Anjan Sahni, Special Assistant United States Attorney (Roslynn R. Mauskopf, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Alexander H. Southwell, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Celeste L. Koeleveld, Special Assistant United States Attorney, of counsel), Brooklyn, NY, for Appellee.