Skip to main content

United States Second Circuit


Vadas v. US, 06-2087

Denial of petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence is affirmed over petitioner's arguments that his attorneys' failure to focus on the non-existence and the invalidity of enhancement notifications deprived him of the constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/03/2007
  • Published 05/03/2007

Judges

  • CALABRESI, Circuit Judge., Before:  JACOBS, Chief Circuit Judge, WALKER, CALABRESI Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Second Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Cheryl J. Sturm, Chadds Ford, Pa., for Petitioner.

  • For Appellees:
  • Kevin O'Connor, U.S. Attorney for the District of Connecticut;  Harold H. Chen and William J. Nardini, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, for Respondent.
Copied to clipboard