United States Second Circuit
Vadas v. US, 06-2087
Denial of petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence is affirmed over petitioner's arguments that his attorneys' failure to focus on the non-existence and the invalidity of enhancement notifications deprived him of the constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/03/2007
- Published 05/03/2007
Judges
- CALABRESI, Circuit Judge., Before: JACOBS, Chief Circuit Judge, WALKER, CALABRESI Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Second Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Cheryl J. Sturm, Chadds Ford, Pa., for Petitioner.
- For Appellees:
- Kevin O'Connor, U.S. Attorney for the District of Connecticut; Harold H. Chen and William J. Nardini, Assistant U.S. Attorneys, for Respondent.