United States Second Circuit
Arlio v. Lively, 05-5779
Judgment for plaintiff on claim of retaliatory suspension, in case alleging the acting chief of police, a Republican, suspended plaintiff on trumped-up charges for supporting local Democrats, is vacated as the district court abused its discretion by allowing into evidence irrelevant and prejudicial testimony concerning a state arbitration board's prior findings in plaintiff's favor.
Appellate Information
- Decided 01/17/2007
- Published 01/18/2007
Judges
- McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge:, Before: WINTER, McLAUGHLIN, and STRAUB, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Second Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Karen Lee Torre, Law Offices of Karen Lee Torre, New Haven, CT, for Plaintiff-Appellee James Arlio., James E. Coyne, Coyne, von Kuhn, Brady & Fries, LLC (Colleen D. Fries and Tyler M. Barhorst, on the brief), Stratford, CT, for Defendant-Appellant Marlin J. Lively.