Skip to main content

United States Second Circuit


US v. Samet, 03-1420

Conviction of conducting and participating in the affairs of a racketeering enterprise, mail fraud, bank fraud, and money laundering, is affirmed over claim of one of defendants that the district court erred by refusing to strike lay opinion testimony identifying his handwriting on certain documents.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/11/2006
  • Published 09/12/2006

Judges

  • HALL, Circuit Judge., Before:  JACOBS, SOTOMAYOR, and HALL, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Second Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Andrew Citron, Of Counsel, New York, NY, for Appellant Hollender.

  • For Appellees:
  • Maria A. Barton, Assistant United States Attorney (David N. Kelley, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Maria B. Feinzig, Cathy Seibel, Laura Grossfiled Birger, Celeste L. Koeleveld, Assistant United States Attorneys), New York, NY, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard