United States Second Circuit
Rosenberg v. MetLife, Inc., 05-4363
In a libel action brought by a terminated broker, claiming that statements made on an NASD employee termination form (Form U-5) are subject to an absolute privilege under New York law, the following question is certified to the New York Court of Appeals: Are statements made by an employer on a Form U-5 subject to an absolute or a qualified privilege?
Appellate Information
- Decided 06/29/2006
- Published 06/29/2006
Judges
- PER CURIAM:, Before: JACOBS, Chief Judge, WALKER and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Second Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Maurice W. Heller (Jacob W. Heller and Allen M. Eisenberg, on the brief), Heller Horowitz & Feit, P.C., New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Steven E. Obus (Steven Yarusinsky, on the brief), Proskauer Rose LLP, Newark, NJ, for Defendants-Appellees.