United States Second Circuit
Farrell v. Burke, 05-0169
Grant of summary judgment rejecting plaintiff's vagueness and overbreadth challenges to a special condition of his state parole that prohibited his possession of pornographic material is affirmed where: 1) special condition would have given notice to a reasonable parolee that he should not buy a book containing sexually explicit pictures and lurid descriptions of sex between men and boys; 2) no reasonable enforcing officer could have doubted that Scum fell within the terms of the condition; and 3) condition applied only to one person, a paroled sex offender whose First Amendment rights to sexual material were limited, such that there was no threat of chilling constitutionally protected conduct.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/31/2006
- Published 05/31/2006
Judges
- SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge., Before: SOTOMAYOR and KATZMANN, Circuit Judges, and EATON, Judge.
Court
- United States Second Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Eugene B. Nathanson, New York, New York, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Ann P. Zybert, Assistant Solicitor General (Eliot Spitzer, Attorney General of the State of New York, on the brief; Michael Belohlavek, Senior Counsel, Division of Appeals & Opinions, Daniel Chepaitis, Assistant Solicitor General, of counsel), New York, New York, for Defendants-Appellees.