United States Second Circuit

An order denying inmate-intervenor's motion for a protective order and requiring her to deliver certain documents to defendant, a correctional officer, in the course of his criminal prosecution is vacated where the district court erred in aspects of its findings that the documents were not protected by the attorney-client privilege and that the inmate had no expectation of privacy in the contents of her cell.

Appellate Information

• Decided 03/16/2006
• Published 03/16/2006

Judges

• PER CURIAM., Before:  JACOBS and WESLEY, Circuit Judges, and KOELTL, District Judge.

Court

• United States Second Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Mark A. Racanelli, O'Melveny & Myers LLP, New York, New York (Howard E. Heiss, on the brief), for Intervenor-Movant-Appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• Joel K. Dranove, New York, New York, for Defendant-Appellee.