United States Second Circuit
US v. Estrada, 02-1543, 02-1545, 02-1626
Defendants' convictions and sentences for drug offenses are affirmed where a defendant's statement in response to a police question before he was read his Miranda rights falls within the public safety exception to the Miranda requirements, and exclusion of certain impeachment evidence was harmless error.
Appellate Information
- Decided 11/29/2005
- Published 11/29/2005
Judges
- SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge., Before: WINTER, SOTOMAYOR, WESLEY, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Second Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- Dan E. LaBelle, Halloran & Sage, LLP, Westport, CT, for Defendant-Appellant Felix DeJesus., Robert J. Sullivan, Westport, CT, for Defendant-Appellant Ricardo Rosario., Alex Hernandez, Assistant United States Attorney (Kevin J. O'Connor, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut, Alina P. Marquez, Jeffrey A. Meyer, Assistant United States Attorneys, on the brief), Bridgeport, CT, for Appellee.