United States Second Circuit
MOTOROLA CREDIT CORP. v. UZAN, 03-7792
In a suit involving corporate fraud, judgment in favor of plaintiff is reversed where the district court failed to make sufficiently specific factual findings in support of its imposition of a constructive trust in favor of plaintiff.
Appellate Information
- Decided 10/22/2004
- Published 10/25/2004
Judges
- JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge., Before: MINER, CALABRESI, and CABRANES, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Second Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Howard Stahl (Steven K. Davidson, Charles G. Cole, Bruce C. Bishop, of counsel), Steptoe & Johnson, L.L.P., Washington, DC (Craig A. Stewart, Anthony J. Franze, Arnold & Porter, L.L.P., Washington, DC, of counsel), for Plaintiff Motorola Credit Corporation., Jason Brown (David D. Howe, of counsel), Holland & Knight, L.L.P., New York, NY, for Plaintiff Nokia Corporation.
- For Appellees:
- Floyd Abrams (R. Stan Mortenson, Baker Botts, L.L.P., Washington, DC, of counsel), Cahill, Gordon & Reindel, L.L.P., New York, NY, for Defendants Cem Cengiz Uzan and Murat Hakan Uzan., Nathan Lewin (Robert F. Serio, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, L.L.P., New York, NY, of counsel), Lewin & Lewin, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Defendants Kemal Uzan, Melabat Uzan, Aysegul Akay, and Antonio Luna Betancourt., Carter G. Phillips (Bradford A. Berenson, of counsel), Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Defendants Unikom Iletism Hizmetleri Pazarlama A.S., Standart Pazarlama A.S., and Standart Telekomunikasyon Bilgisayar Hizmetleri A.S.