United States Second Circuit

The variance between the single conspiracy charged in the indictment and the multiple conspiracy established at trial did not substantially prejudice any defendant in conviction of conspiracy to commit insider trading.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/28/2004
• Published 05/28/2004

Judges

• POOLER, Circuit Judge., Before:  OAKES, POOLER, and WESLEY Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Second Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Robert J. Anello,Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason & Silberberg, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Daniel L. Rashbaum, Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason & Silberger, P.C.;  Neil & Harwell, PLC, Nashville, TN, on the brief), for Defendant-Appellant Geibel., Arza Feldman, Feldman & Feldman, (Steven A. Feldman, on the brief), Hauppauge, NY, for Defendant-Appellant Allen., Jane Simkin Smith, Millbrook, N.Y., for Defendant-Appellant Conner., I. Bennett Capers, assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, (James B. Comey, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York and Gary Stein, assistant United States Attorney, on the brief), New York, NY, for Appellee.