Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Second Circuit


US v. LIFSHITZ, 03-1221

Though the "special needs" of the probation system are sufficient to justify conditioning defendant's probation on his agreement to submit to home-computer monitoring, the scope of the condition as it stands may be overbroad; the condition is vacated and remanded.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/30/2004
  • Published 03/30/2004

Judges

  • KATZMANN, Circuit Judge:, Before:  CALABRESI, KATZMANN, and B.D. PARKER, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Second Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Jennifer G. Rodgers, Assistant United States Attorney (Celeste L. Koeleveld, Assistant United States Attorney on the brief) for James B. Comey, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, NY, for Appellee United States of America., Steven M. Statsinger, The Legal Aid Society, Federal Defender Division, Appeals Bureau, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellant Brandon Michael Lifshitz.
Copied to clipboard