United States Second Circuit

The district court's denial of defendant's motion to stay in favor of arbitration, pursuant to Federal Arbitration Act is affirmed where, on the record, the dispute is nor exchange-related. However, the case is remanded remand for further consideration of whether new alleged facts render the dispute "exchange-related."

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/12/2003
• Published 11/12/2003

Judges

• GARAUFIS, District Judge., Before:  CALABRESI and SACK, Circuit Judges, and GARAUFIS, District Judge.

Court

• United States Second Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• Edward M. Spiro,Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason & Silberberg, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Jay Goldberg, Jay Goldberg, P.C., New York, NY, on the brief), for Plaintiff-Appellee., Daniel M. Mandil, Covington & Burling, New York, N.Y. (Michael Winger, on the brief), for Defendant-Appellant.