United States Second Circuit
BRODY v. VILLAGE OF PORT CHESTER, 01-9219
Plaintiff has standing to challenge the lack of individual notice that a formal determination and finding had been reached and published, triggering a thirty-day limitations period in which any challenges to the taking of property must be brought under Article 2 of the Eminent Domain Procedure Law (EDPL). Due process challenges to this statutory regime are not barred by res judicata under the circumstances.
Appellate Information
- Decided 09/24/2003
- Published 09/24/2003
Judges
- SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge., Before: SACK and SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges, and DANIELS, District Judge.
Court
- United States Second Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Dana Berliner,Institute for Justice, Washington, DC (William H. Mellor, Marni Soupcoff, Institute for Justice, on the brief, Martin Kaufman, Atlantic Legal Foundation, New York, NY, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant., Michael Rikon, Goldstein, Goldstein, Rikon & Gottlieb, P.C., New York, NY, for amicus curie Michael Rikon.
- For Appellees:
- Alan D. Scheinkman, Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C., New York, NY (Darryll A. Buford, J. William Cook, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.