Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Second Circuit


BRODY v. VILLAGE OF PORT CHESTER, 01-9219

Plaintiff has standing to challenge the lack of individual notice that a formal determination and finding had been reached and published, triggering a thirty-day limitations period in which any challenges to the taking of property must be brought under Article 2 of the Eminent Domain Procedure Law (EDPL). Due process challenges to this statutory regime are not barred by res judicata under the circumstances.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 09/24/2003
  • Published 09/24/2003

Judges

  • SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge., Before:  SACK and SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges, and DANIELS, District Judge.

Court

  • United States Second Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Dana Berliner,Institute for Justice, Washington, DC (William H. Mellor, Marni Soupcoff, Institute for Justice, on the brief, Martin Kaufman, Atlantic Legal Foundation, New York, NY, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellant., Michael Rikon, Goldstein, Goldstein, Rikon & Gottlieb, P.C., New York, NY, for amicus curie Michael Rikon.

  • For Appellees:
  • Alan D. Scheinkman, Epstein, Becker & Green, P.C., New York, NY (Darryll A. Buford, J. William Cook, on the brief), for defendant-appellee.
Copied to clipboard