United States Second Circuit
BISHOP v. NAT'L HEALTH INS. CO., 02-9032
The district court erred in finding that plaintiff's intoxication exclusion in their policy with defendant should not apply because the exclusion is ambiguous.
Appellate Information
- Argued 05/05/2003
- Decided 09/22/2003
- Published 09/22/2003
Judges
- CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge., Before: WALKER, Chief Judge, CARDAMONE, and SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Second Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellees:
- William H. Clendenen, Jr., New Haven, Connecticut (Kevin C. Shea, Nancy L. Walker, Clendenen & Shea, LLC, New Haven, Connecticut, of counsel), for Defendant-Appellant., John F. Wynne, Jr., New Haven, Connecticut (Buckley & Wynne, New Haven, Connecticut, of counsel), for Plaintiffs-Appellees.