United States Second Circuit

Although the omission of the condition of supervised release from the oral pronouncement of sentence was probably harmless error, it would be prudent to remand the sentence to afford the District Court an opportunity to reconsider imposition of the employment condition after hearing the objection of the defendant.

Appellate Information

• Decided 05/08/2003
• Published 05/08/2003

Judges

• JON O. NEWMAN, Circuit Judge., Before:  NEWMAN, POOLER, and KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.

Court

• United States Second Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Vassilios Handakas, Sands Point, N.Y., submitted a pro se brief.


• For Appellees:
  
• James B. Lebow,Bournazos & Matarangas, New York, N.Y., for Defendant-Appellant., Debra D. Newman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Brooklyn, N.Y. (Roslynn R. Mauskopf, U.S. Atty., Susan Corkery, Asst. U.S. Atty., Brooklyn, N.Y., on the brief), for Appellee.