United States Second Circuit
PROFITNESS PHYSICAL THERAPY CTR. v. PRO-FIT ORTHOPEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY P.C., 01-7874
Read PROFITNESS PHYSICAL THERAPY CTR. v. PRO-FIT ORTHOPEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY P.C., 01-7874
READ
READ
Defendant in an action for trademark infringement, trademark dilution, and unfair competition under the Lanham Act, was not entitled to summary judgment based on the defenses of acquiescence and laches, where the district court failed to analyze likelihood of confusion.
Appellate Information
- Decided 12/24/2002
- Published 12/24/2002
Judges
- JOHN M. WALKER, JR., Chief Judge., Before WALKER, Chief Judge, WINTER and CALABRESI, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Second Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Anthony H. Handal,Handal & Morofsky, Norwalk, CT, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Daniel H. Weiner, Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellee.