Skip to main content

United States Second Circuit


US v. JONES, 01-1607

The fact that defendant was required to choose between asserting his right to silence and pursuing an effective defense against parole revocation, did not amount to the intensity of coercion that could deprive him of the right against compelled self-incrimination.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/02/2002
  • Published 08/05/2002

Judges

  • KATZMANN, Circuit Judge., Before JACOBS, LEVAL, and KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Second Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Martin R. Stolar, New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellant., Sharon L. McCarthy, Assistant United States Attorney (James B. Comey, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York and Deborah E. Landis, Assistant United States Attorney, on the brief), New York, NY, for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard