United States Second Circuit

A charge of conspiracy to engage in monetary transactions of criminally derived property was not barred by the statute of limitations, because the conspiracy continued at least until the conspirators received their anticipated economic benefits.

Appellate Information

• Decided 07/31/2002
• Published 07/31/2002

Judges

• OAKES, Senior Circuit Judge., Before OAKES and SACK, Circuit Judges, and BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.

Court

• United States Second Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellees:
  
• John M. Thompson, Springfield, MA (Peter L. Maroulis, Poughkeepsie, NY, of counsel), for Defendant-Appellant., Diane Gujarati, Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, New York, N.Y. (Mary Jo White, United States Attorney, Barbara Guss and Celeste L. Koeleveld, Assistant United States Attorneys, of counsel), for Appellee.