Skip to main content

United States Second Circuit


US v. DOE #1, 00-1224

In evaluating a denial of a motion to substitute counsel, a defendant's own conduct contributing to the communication breakdown should be evaluated.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 04/23/2001
  • Decided 11/08/2001
  • Published 11/08/2001

Judges

  • F.I. PARKER, Circuit Judge:, Before:  JACOBS, F.I. PARKER, and KATZMANN, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Second Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellees:
  • Gary D. Weinberger, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Hartford, Connecticut (Thomas G. Dennis, Federal Public Defender, Dalit Yarden-Krug, Research and Writing Specialist, Office of the Federal Public Defender, Hartford, Connecticut, on the brief), for Defendant-Appellant., Christopher W. Schmeisser, Assistant United States Attorney, District of Connecticut, Bridgeport, Connecticut (Stephen C. Robinson, United States Attorney, District of Connecticut, Bridgeport, Connecticut, on the brief), for Appellee.
Copied to clipboard