Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States Second Circuit


LOLISCIO v. GOORD, 00-2594

After a state court, relying on subjective juror testimony, rejects a defendant's Sixth Amendment claim predicated on jury consideration of extra-record information, the federal habeas court, excluding the subjective juror testimony, may not then determine that the petitioner's Sixth Amendment rights were violated.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 05/15/2001
  • Decided 08/31/2001
  • Published 08/31/2001

Judges

  • SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judge:, Before FEINBERG, OAKES, and SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Second Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Richard M. Asche,Litman, Asche & Gioiella, LLP, New York, NY, for Petitioner-Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Mark Cohen, Assistant District Attorney, Suffolk County, N.Y. (James M. Catterson, Jr., District Attorney of Suffolk County, Glenn Green, Assistant District Attorney, on the brief), for Respondent-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard