United States Second Circuit
ROGE v. NYP HOLDINGS, INC., 00-7773
Employer's statements that it laid off employee because he fraudulently filed for disability benefits and because of a general reduction in force are not necessarily inconsistent to support a finding of pretext in an age discrimination claim. Differing statements about the reason for laying off an employee do not necessarily support a claim of pretext in an age discrimination claim where the statements are not inconsistent.
Appellate Information
- Argued 01/11/2001
- Decided 07/17/2001
- Published 07/17/2001
Judges
- WINTER, Circuit Judge:, Before VAN GRAAFEILAND, WINTER, and CALABRESI, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Second Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Leslie H. Ben-Zvi,Queller, Fisher, Dienst, Serrins, Washor & Kool, LLP (Alan Serrins and Joseph A. Turco, of counsel), New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Clifford Thau, Squadron, Ellenoff, Plesent & Sheinfeld, LLP (J. Jordan Lippner and Laura Davidson, of counsel), New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellee.