Skip to main content

United States Second Circuit


ROGE v. NYP HOLDINGS, INC., 00-7773

Employer's statements that it laid off employee because he fraudulently filed for disability benefits and because of a general reduction in force are not necessarily inconsistent to support a finding of pretext in an age discrimination claim. Differing statements about the reason for laying off an employee do not necessarily support a claim of pretext in an age discrimination claim where the statements are not inconsistent.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 01/11/2001
  • Decided 07/17/2001
  • Published 07/17/2001

Judges

  • WINTER, Circuit Judge:, Before VAN GRAAFEILAND, WINTER, and CALABRESI, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Second Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Leslie H. Ben-Zvi,Queller, Fisher, Dienst, Serrins, Washor & Kool, LLP (Alan Serrins and Joseph A. Turco, of counsel), New York, NY, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Clifford Thau, Squadron, Ellenoff, Plesent & Sheinfeld, LLP (J. Jordan Lippner and Laura Davidson, of counsel), New York, NY, for Defendant-Appellee.
Copied to clipboard