United States Second Circuit
SEQUA CORP. v. GELMIN, 00-7025
Under Fed R. Civ. P. 24(a), a discharged lawyer, who has a charging lien against his former client that he believes is in jeopardy by ongoing litigation, lacks an interest justifying intervention as of right in the litigation.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/24/2001
- Published 05/24/2001
Judges
- CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:, Before: CARDAMONE, JACOBS, and SACK, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Second Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Thomas Butler, New York, N.Y. (Raymond Fitzgerald, Butler, Fitzgerald & Potter, New York, NW, of counsel), for Appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Brooks R. Burdette, New York, N.Y. (Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, New York, NY, of counsel), for Plaintiffs-Appellees., James C. Jones, New York, N.Y. (Charles B. Manuel, Jr., Law Offices of Manuel & Jones, P.C., New York, NY, of counsel), for Defendants-Appellees.