Skip to main content

United States Second Circuit


AIRTOUCH PAGING v. FCC, 00-4035

Paging company does not have standing to challenge FCC regulation stating that paging companies are not "telephone exchange services," when other FCC regulations provide them with benefits similar to those for telephone exchange services.

Appellate Information

  • Argued 10/27/2000
  • Decided 12/12/2000
  • Published 12/12/2000

Judges

  • SACK, Circuit Judge:, Before OAKES, WINTER and SACK, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States Second Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Carl W. Northrop,Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Warner, LLP, Washington, DC (Daniel R. Ball, of counsel), for Petitioner.

  • For Appellees:
  • Laurel R. Bergold, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC (Joel I. Klein, Assistant Attorney General, Christopher J. Wright, General Counsel, Catherine G. O'Sullivan, Robert Wiggers, and John E. Ingle, of counsel), for Respondents.
Copied to clipboard