United States Second Circuit
AERONAUTICAL INDUS. v. UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORP., 00-7168
Collective bargaining agreement stating that disputes over bargaining unit work would be submitted to an Executive Steering Committee for final resolution does not preclude judicial review, because the clause does not clearly indicate that submission is meant to be final and binding.
Appellate Information
- Decided 10/26/2000
- Published 10/26/2000
Judges
- JOHN M. WALKER, Jr., Chief Judge:, Before: WALKER, Chief Judge, KEARSE and CARDAMONE, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States Second Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Richard Blumenthal, Attorney General of Connecticut, Charles A. Overend, Thomas P. Clifford, III, and Richard T. Sponzo, Assistant Attorneys General, Hartford, CT, for Amicus Curiae the State of Connecticut.
- For Appellees:
- Joel H. Kaplan,Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson, Chicago, IL (Gary S. Kaplan, Seyfarth, Shaw, Fairweather & Geraldson; and Gary L. Lieber, Henry A. Platt, Schmeltzer, Aptaker & Shepard, P.C., Washington, DC, on the brief) for Defendant-Appellant., Gregg D. Adler, Livingston, Adler, Pulda & Meiklejohn, P.C., Hartford, CT (Mary E. Kelly, Livingston, Adler, Pulda & Meiklejohn, P.C.; and Jonathan P. Hiatt, James B. Coppess, AFL-CIO, Washington, DC, on the brief) for Plaintiff-Appellee.