United States First Circuit
US v. Arthur, 13-1892
Denial of defendant's motions to suppress evidence is affirmed, where: 1) the generic physical description of the suspects in this case, when considered in light of all the attendant circumstances, was constitutionally sufficient to justify an investigatory stop; and 2) the admission of a store clerk's eyewitness identification testimony did not threaten unfairness so egregious as to demand suppression.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/22/2014
- Published 08/22/2014
Judges
- SELYA
Court
- United States First Circuit