United States First Circuit
US v. Dirosa, 13-1643
Defendant's conviction and sentence for wire fraud are affirmed, where: 1) there was sufficient evidence in the record from which a jury could have reasonably concluded that the government proved all of the essential elements of wire fraud; 2) the district court did not abuse its discretion in admitting testimony regarding defendant's prior acts; 3) the district court did not err in admitting statements of a co-conspirator; and 4) defendant's sentence is reasonable.
Appellate Information
- Decided 08/05/2014
- Published 08/05/2014
Judges
- THOMPSON
Court
- United States First Circuit