United States First Circuit

Defendant's sentence for three supervised release violations is affirmed, where defendant has not made out a viable claim under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(i)(3)(B ) because the district court's discussion of the incidents at issue involved the inference to be drawn from uncontested facts, and not whether the activities occurred.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/20/2013
• Published 11/20/2013

Judges

• SELYA

Court

• United States First Circuit

Counsel