Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States First Circuit


US v. Soto, 11-1646

Defendant's convictions of mail fraud, wire fraud, bank fraud, and aggravated identity theft are affirmed, where: 1) the trial court did not violate defendant's Sixth Amendment right to confront the witnesses against him by admitting testimony of a forensic examiner about another examiner's prior examination; and 2) the evidence was sufficient to support defendant's aggravated identity theft convictions.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 06/24/2013
  • Published 06/24/2013

Judges

  • TORRESEN

Court

  • United States First Circuit

Counsel

Copied to clipboard