United States First Circuit
Cheung v. Holder, 11-1889
In a case in which a native and citizen of Hong Kong was denied cancellation of removal on the ground that he lacked ten years' continuous physical presence in the United States, a petition for review is denied, where a notice to appear (NTA) was effective to stop accrual of time, despite the fact that the charge alleged, fraud, was subsequently withdrawn and a new charge, overstaying, was added with the filing of Form I-261 approximately six months later, since the NTA itself was never withdrawn.
Appellate Information
- Decided 05/02/2012
- Published 05/02/2012
Judges
- Thompson
Court
- United States First Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- John Chang, Kristin A. Moresi