United States First Circuit
Hunt v. Golden Rule Insurance Company, 10-2065
In an insurance coverage dispute involving an action for breach of contract and unfair insurance trade practice, summary judgment in favor of defendant on the ground that a policy provision that contained a lifetime cap on mental or nervous disorder benefits was not ambiguous, and thus enforceable, is affirmed because trial court reasonably construed provision and state Unfair Insurance Trade Practices Law precludes a private right of action.
Appellate Information
- Decided 04/19/2011
- Published 04/19/2011
Judges
- HOWARD
Court
- United States First Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Gordon R. Blakeney, William D. Pandolph