Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States First Circuit


IOM Corp. v. Brown Forman Corp., 09-1672

In plaintiff's suit against a marketer and distributor of liquor for unlawful termination of its sales representation contract and for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing pursuant to the Puerto Rico Sales Representative Act, commonly known as Law 21, district court's judgment in favor of the defendant is affirmed where: 1) the district court properly dismissed plaintiff's Law 21 claim for failure to state a claim as the well-pleaded facts in plaintiff's complaint do not support the conclusion that it procured and closed sales on defendant's behalf; 2) the district court properly referred the breach of contract claim to arbitration as the arbitration clauses can be reasonably interpreted to cover plaintiff's claim that defendant breached the commercial relationship between the parties in bad faith; and 3) district court's attorneys' fees award to defendant withstands plain error review.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/02/2010
  • Published 12/02/2010

Judges

Court

  • United States First Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Rubén T. Nigaglioni, Rafael Escalera-Rodríguez

Copied to clipboard