Skip to main content

United States First Circuit


DeBurgo v. Amand, 09-1145

Denial of defendant's request for habeas relief arising from his conviction for armed assault with intent to murder and assault and batter by means of a dangerous weapon is affirmed where: 1) a state appeals court's analysis of the sufficiency of the evidence was not an unreasonable application of the Supreme Court's standard announced in Jackson given the sufficiently suggestive circumstantial evidence presented; and 2) defendant was not deprived of his Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 11/19/2009
  • Published 11/19/2009

Judges

  • STAHL, Circuit Judge., Before LIPEZ, STAHL, and HOWARD, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States First Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Elizabeth Doherty, by Appointment of the Court, for petitioner.

  • For Appellees:
  • Argie K. Shapiro, Assistant Attorney General, with whom Martha Coakley, Attorney General, was on brief for respondent.
Copied to clipboard