Skip to main content

United States First Circuit


US v. LaFortune, 06-1699

Conviction and sentence on child pornography charges are affirmed where: 1) expert testimony concerning whether images depict real rather than virtual children is not required in order for a magistrate judge to determine whether there is probable cause to issue a search warrant for a defendant's home; and 2) a jury was not required to determine the fact of defendant's prior convictions in order to apply a sentencing enhancement for recidivism.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 03/18/2008
  • Published 03/18/2008

Judges

  • LIPEZ, Circuit Judge., Before LIPEZ, Circuit Judge, CYR, Senior Circuit Judge, and HOWARD, Circuit Judge.

Court

  • United States First Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Raymond E. Gillespie, for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Mark T. Quinlivan, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Michael J. Sullivan, United States Attorney, was on brief for appellee.
Copied to clipboard