Skip to main content

United States First Circuit


US v. Richardson, 06-2506

Conviction and sentence on drug and weapons charges are affirmed over defendant's arguments that: 1) the district court erred in refusing to sever several of the charges; 2) the district court erred in admitting extrinsic evidence of an alleged prior inconsistent statement; 3) the district court erroneously denied his motion to suppress drugs seized during an inventory search of his vehicle; 4) the district court erred in sentencing him as a career offender and as an armed career criminal; and 5) the district court erroneously failed to determine whether sentencing entrapment or sentencing factor manipulation had occurred.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 02/08/2008
  • Published 02/08/2008

Judges

  • GELPÍ, District Judge., Before LIPEZ and HOWARD, Circuit Judges, and GELPÍ, District Judge.

Court

  • United States First Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Matthew V. Soares, with whom Melvin Richardson, pro se, was on brief, for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Vijay Shanker, Attorney, United States Department of Justice, with whom Paul Hart Smyth, Assistant United States Attorney, and Michael J. Sullivan, United States Attorney, were on brief, for appellee.
Copied to clipboard