United States First Circuit
US v. Richardson, 06-2506
Conviction and sentence on drug and weapons charges are affirmed over defendant's arguments that: 1) the district court erred in refusing to sever several of the charges; 2) the district court erred in admitting extrinsic evidence of an alleged prior inconsistent statement; 3) the district court erroneously denied his motion to suppress drugs seized during an inventory search of his vehicle; 4) the district court erred in sentencing him as a career offender and as an armed career criminal; and 5) the district court erroneously failed to determine whether sentencing entrapment or sentencing factor manipulation had occurred.
Appellate Information
- Decided 02/08/2008
- Published 02/08/2008
Judges
- GELPÍ, District Judge., Before LIPEZ and HOWARD, Circuit Judges, and GELPÍ, District Judge.
Court
- United States First Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Matthew V. Soares, with whom Melvin Richardson, pro se, was on brief, for appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Vijay Shanker, Attorney, United States Department of Justice, with whom Paul Hart Smyth, Assistant United States Attorney, and Michael J. Sullivan, United States Attorney, were on brief, for appellee.