Skip to main content

United States First Circuit


US v. Dwinells, 06-1709

Conviction for child pornography and enticement are affirmed over claims that: 1) the statute under which he was convicted, 18 U.S.C. section 2422(b), requires proof that an intent that the enticed conduct actually take place; and 2) the evidence did not support defendant's convictions on two of the three enticement counts.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 11/20/2007
  • Published 11/20/2007

Judges

  • SELYA, Senior Circuit Judge., Before LIPEZ, Circuit Judge, SELYA, Senior Circuit Judge, and DELGADO-COLÓN, District Judge.

Court

  • United States First Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Christopher R. Goddu, Federal Defender Office, with whom Syrie Fried, Federal Defender Office, was on brief, for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Donald L. Cabell, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Michael J. Sullivan, United States Attorney, was on brief, for appellee.
Copied to clipboard