United States First Circuit
US v. Roy, 07-1063
Sentence for violating conditions of supervised release for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant's argument that a period of community confinement should have counted towards a 24-month aggregate limit on prison time for violations of supervised release did not constitute a plain error for purposes of plain error review; and 2) the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to assign defendant to a halfway house despite defendant's claim of a serious medical condition.
Appellate Information
- Decided 10/23/2007
- Published 10/23/2007
Judges
- BOUDIN, Chief Judge., Before BOUDIN, Chief Judge, LYNCH, Circuit Judge, and SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge.
Court
- United States First Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Robert C. Andrews, for appellant.
- For Appellees:
- Margaret D. McGaughey, Appellate Chief, with whom Paula D. Silsby, United States Attorney, was on brief for appellee.