Skip to main content

United States First Circuit


US v. Stark, 06-1853

Conviction and sentence for conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute are affirmed over defendant's arguments that the district court: 1) should have suppressed his third confession; 2) mistakenly admitted suppressed evidence at trial; 3) misled the jury in responding to a question regarding witness testimony; 4) erroneously failed to enter a judgment of acquittal; and 5) improperly found that Stark did not qualify for a safety valve sentence reduction.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/16/2007
  • Published 08/16/2007

Judges

  • FUSTÉ, District Judge., Before TORRUELLA and LIPEZ, Circuit Judges, and FUSTÉ, District Judge.

Court

  • United States First Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Melvin Norris, with whom Richard J. Farrell, Jr., was on brief for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Michael J. Burstein, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, with whom Michael J. Sullivan, United States Attorney, and Jennifer Hay Zacks, Assistant United States Attorney, were on brief for appellee.
Copied to clipboard