Skip to main content

United States First Circuit


US v. Jiminez, 06-2343

Conviction for conspiracy to distribute heroin resulting in a death is affirmed over defendant's arguments that: 1) he was unaware of the mandatory minimum sentence and therefore could not have made a knowing and voluntary plea; 2) his plea rested on an inadequate factual predicate; 3) the "death resulting" sentence enhancement should have been proven beyond a reasonable doubt; and 4) the government needed to proffer evidence that death was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of his heroin distribution in order to justify his sentence.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/14/2007
  • Published 08/14/2007

Judges

  • SELYA, Senior Circuit Judge., Before Lipez, Circuit Judge, Selya and Stahl, Senior Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States First Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Martin D. Harris on brief for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Thomas P. Colantuono, United States Attorney, and Donald A. Feith, Assistant United States Attorney, on brief for appellee.
Copied to clipboard