United States First Circuit
DAVID v. HALL, 01-2289
The running of the 28 U.S.C. section 2244(d)(1) limitations period will not be equitably tolled, as a mistake by counsel in reading the statute or computing the time limit is a routine error. The limitations period is not unconstitutional.
Appellate Information
- Decided 02/05/2003
- Published 02/05/2003
Judges
- BOUDIN, Chief Judge., Before BOUDIN, Chief Judge, TORRUELLA and LIPEZ, Circuit Judges.
Court
- United States First Circuit
Counsel
- For Appellant:
- Robert L. Sheketoff for petitioner.
- For Appellees:
- Cathryn A. Neaves, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Bureau, with whom Thomas F. Reilly, Attorney General, was on brief for respondent.