Skip to main content

United States First Circuit


DAVID v. HALL, 01-2289

The running of the 28 U.S.C. section 2244(d)(1) limitations period will not be equitably tolled, as a mistake by counsel in reading the statute or computing the time limit is a routine error. The limitations period is not unconstitutional.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 02/05/2003
  • Published 02/05/2003

Judges

  • BOUDIN, Chief Judge., Before BOUDIN, Chief Judge, TORRUELLA and LIPEZ, Circuit Judges.

Court

  • United States First Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Robert L. Sheketoff for petitioner.

  • For Appellees:
  • Cathryn A. Neaves, Assistant Attorney General, Criminal Bureau, with whom Thomas F. Reilly, Attorney General, was on brief for respondent.
Copied to clipboard