Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States First Circuit


AINSWORTH v. STANLEY, 00-1678

The requirement that convicted sex offenders disclose their histories of sexual misconduct to participate in a Sex Offenders Program (SOP) did not violate the Fifth Amendment, because the reduced likelihood of parole for refusal to participate in the SOP does not constitute a penalty sufficient to compel incriminating speech.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 12/24/2002
  • Published 12/30/2002

Judges

  • LIPEZ, Circuit Judge., Before BOUDIN, Chief Judge, TORRUELLA, and LIPEZ, Circuit Judges

Court

  • United States First Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Michael J. Sheehan, for appellants.

  • For Appellees:
  • Andrew B. Livernois, Assistant Attorney General, with whom Philip T. McLaughlin, Attorney General of the State of New Hampshire was on brief, for appellee.
Copied to clipboard