United States First Circuit

A city ordinance governing the moving of buildings, was not void for vagueness on its face, as vesting unfettered discretion in the mayor to grant permits. No viable equal protection claim exists in plaintiffs' allegations that defendants added conditions to a permit application.

Appellate Information

• Decided 11/15/2002
• Published 11/15/2002

Judges

• TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge., Before TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge, B. FLETCHER, Senior Circuit Judge, and LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

Court

• United States First Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Rosemary A. Macero, with whom Macero and Associates, P.C. was on brief, for appellants.


• For Appellees:
  
• Gregg J. Corbo, with whom Joseph L. Tehan, Jr. and Kopelman and Paige, P.C. were on brief, for appellees.