Skip to main content

United States First Circuit


MEDINA v. MATESANZ, 01-2585

Erroneous malice instruction, shifting the burden to defendant in violation of due process, was harmless where it did not have a "substantial and injurious effect on the verdict" under Brecht v. Abrahamson, 507 U.S. 619.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 08/07/2002
  • Published 08/07/2002

Judges

  • SCHWARZER, Senior Circuit Judge., Before TORRUELLA and LIPEZ, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, Senior District Judge.

Court

  • United States First Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Jeffrey L. Baler on brief for appellant.

  • For Appellees:
  • Dean A. Mazzone, Assistant Attorney General, with whom Thomas F. Reilly, Attorney General, was on brief for appellees.
Copied to clipboard