United States First Circuit

In an ERISA discrimination claim, when the district court introduced and accepted its own alternative explanation instead of crediting the proffered reasons for an employee's termination, such a factual finding was clearly erroneous.

Appellate Information

• Decided 06/04/2002
• Published 06/04/2002

Judges

• TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge., Before TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge, STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge, and LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

Court

• United States First Circuit

Counsel

• For Appellant:
  
• Roy T. Englert, Jr., with whom Daniel Solin, Arnon D. Siegel and Robbins, Russell, Englert, Orseck & Untereiner, LLP were on brief, for appellant.


• For Appellees:
  
• James E. Wallace, Jr., with whom Renee E. Hackett and Bowditch & Dewey, LLP were on brief, for appellee.