Skip to main content
Find a Lawyer

United States First Circuit


HOCHEN v. BOBST GROUP, INC., 00-1841

Appellants did not produce more than a "scintilla of evidence" in support of their theory of an employer's duty in claims relating to a printing press explosion; expert evidence properly excluded where the expert possessed little knowledge of fires and explosions, and of the electronic controls of the printing press in question.

Appellate Information

  • Decided 05/16/2002
  • Published 05/16/2002

Judges

  • STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge., Before TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge, STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge, and LYNCH, Circuit Judge.

Court

  • United States First Circuit

Counsel

  • For Appellant:
  • Janet H. Pumphrey for appellants. John J. St. Andre, St. Andre Law Offices, Michael K. Gillis, Gillis & Bikofsky, PC, Matthew P. McCue, and Mirick, O'Connell, DeMallie & Lougee, LLP, on brief for Massachusetts Academy of Trial Attorneys, amicus curiae.

  • For Appellees:
  • Kevin G. Kenneally, with whom John A. Donovan, Jr. and Donovan Hatem LLP, were on brief, for appellee.
Copied to clipboard